The stop work order remains in effect. The AG's federal lawsuit is pending. DHS did not respond to the senators' May 1 deadline. Meanwhile, at Mesa Gateway Airport, a DHS facility rated for 157 people has held an average of 274 per day in 2026, peaking at 777. The same agency is making unenforceable promises to Surprise about a 542-bed cap. The facility is not open. The next Surprise City Council meeting is Tuesday, May 19.
Three paths through this site. Council votes are held the 1st and 3rd Tuesdays.
The stop work order, the AG's lawsuit, and the three things any resident can do before the May 19 meeting. Everything you need in under two minutes.
Read the brief →Every documented development, with primary sources. Begins with Mesa Gateway overcrowding evidence and the stop work order, and works back through the full record.
Read the record →Attend the May 19 meeting, submit a Call to the Public, email every councilmember by name, sign the student-led 3-Mile Buffer petition, or send the letter template. Every contact is on the record.
See what you can do →Most recent item: May 6, 2026
Tap any headline to expand or collapse
At Mesa Gateway Airport, a DHS detention facility listed at a maximum capacity of 157 people has held an average of 274 per day in 2026, peaking at 777 in a single day. Mesa Fire found overcrowding so severe it issued a corrections list. DHS promised numbers would drop within a week. The next day, the population was 646. The same DHS is making unenforceable verbal promises to Surprise about a 542-bed cap at a facility seven times larger.
Sources: Arizona Mirror: Mesa Can't Enforce Its Own Fire Codes at ICE Facility (April 27, 2026) → | Arizona Mirror: Mesa Airport Warns ICE Facility Landlord (April 30, 2026) → | AZFamily: Concerns Grow Over Mesa Gateway ICE Facility (May 5, 2026) → | KJZZ: Mesa Gateway Authority Director Sends Letter (May 5, 2026) →
On April 16, Senators Kelly and Gallego demanded DHS Secretary Mullin halt all Arizona detention expansion and provide a full briefing no later than May 1, 2026. DHS had already failed to respond to their original February 10 letter. As of May 6, no public response has been disclosed.
Source: KJZZ: Sens. Kelly, Gallego Call on DHS to Halt ICE Expansion in Arizona (April 19, 2026) →
A federal stop work order halted all work on the Surprise facility on April 22, two days before Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes filed suit in federal court. The order was issued to GardaWorld Federal Services and is documented in USAspending.gov, the federal procurement database. DHS, ICE, and GardaWorld have not stated a reason publicly.
Sources: Project Salt Box: Stop Work Order Documented in Federal Records (April 26, 2026) → | AZPM: Stop Work Order Issued for Surprise ICE Facility Contractor (April 27, 2026) → | KJZZ: Stop Work Order Issued for Contractor (April 28, 2026) →
Hundreds of protesters gathered near Sweetwater Avenue and Dysart Road on Saturday, April 25, one day after AG Mayes announced her federal lawsuit against DHS and ICE. The rally followed the April 24 press conference at the site, where Mayes was joined by State Senators Catherine Miranda and Analise Ortiz and Dysart High School Student Body Vice President Cali Overs.
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes filed suit today in federal court against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons. The complaint alleges the defendants failed to conduct or publicize the environmental reviews required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) before proceeding with the Surprise facility. It further alleges the facility violates the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which requires the federal government to arrange “appropriate” places for immigration detention. Mayes announced the suit at the site, near Sweetwater Avenue and Dysart Road, with State Senators Catherine Miranda and Analise Ortiz and Dysart High School Student Body Vice President Cali Overs in attendance.
Primary source: Arizona AG Press Release (April 24, 2026) → | Complaint with exhibits: Arizona v. Mullin (PDF) → | Coverage: Arizona Mirror → | AZPM → | Phoenix New Times → | Maryland precedent: Maryland AG Statement (April 15, 2026) →
On April 7, Councilmember Judd committed on the record to bringing the facility as a formal action item. On April 21, he proposed a letter instead. The letter would request DHS honor local zoning in the LD65 zone and comply with state law restricting residential use near Luke AFB. No resolution was introduced. No vote was taken on the facility. The city attorney intervened publicly when Judd attempted to discuss the contents of the legal review, cautioning him against disclosing privileged information. Judd called for an executive session to determine what he could and could not say. Public comment was again overwhelmingly opposed to the facility.
Source: Surprise City Council Regular Meeting recording, April 21, 2026. Press coverage pending.
Arizona’s two U.S. Senators sent a formal letter to DHS Secretary Mullin demanding a halt to all detention expansion in Arizona until full transparency and community engagement are completed. DHS has not responded to their original February 10 letter. The senators set a May 1 deadline for a response. The letter specifically names students at Dysart High School and Dysart Middle School.
Sources: KJZZ: Sens. Kelly, Gallego Call on DHS to Halt ICE Expansion in Arizona (April 19, 2026) → | Primary source: Letter from Senators Kelly and Gallego to Secretary Mullin, dated April 16, 2026
On the Mike Broomhead Show Wednesday morning, Mayor Kevin Sartor stated that taking legal action against the ICE facility would be a waste of city resources and that he will not pursue it. He said legal action would give residents “false hope.” The statement comes one day after residents protested the facility outside his State of the City address, eight days after 74 speakers addressed the council in opposition, and while Councilmember Chris Judd’s motion to place the facility on the agenda as an action item has not yet come up for a vote. KTAR’s own reporting notes the mayor holds one of seven council votes and can be outvoted.
Sources: KTAR: Surprise Mayor Kevin Sartor Opposes Potential Legal Action (April 15, 2026) → | ABC15: Protesters Spotlight ICE Concerns Outside State of the City (April 14, 2026) → | AZPM: Judd’s April 7 Motion (April 9, 2026) →
On Thursday evening April 9, Reps. Greg Stanton, Yassamin Ansari, and Adelita Grijalva conducted an unannounced oversight visit at the Arizona Removal Operations Coordination Center (AROCC) at Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport. AROCC is an ICE holding facility on the transfer path for people who would cycle through the Surprise facility if it opens. It was designed for 157-person capacity and hold times of less than 12 hours. The oversight visit, prompted by an Arizona Mirror investigation published earlier the same day, found the facility operating far beyond those design parameters. DHS publicly denied the reported conditions, calling the reports “misinformation.”
Why it matters to Surprise: AROCC is the current answer to what a short-term ICE holding facility in Arizona looks like in practice. It operates under the same federal standards DHS cites to reassure Surprise residents. DHS’s verbal commitments for the Surprise facility are the same kind of commitments being publicly contradicted 40 miles away, this week.
Sources: Arizona Mirror: Surprise Inspection Finds ICE Stuffing Migrants “Like Sardines” (April 10, 2026) → | Arizona Mirror: ICE Moved Detainees Out Before Oversight Visit (April 9, 2026) → | Arizona Mirror: “Appallingly Short” Letter to Mullin (April 10, 2026) → | Rep. Grijalva Statement (April 9, 2026) →
The April 7 council meeting drew 74 public speakers, nearly all opposed to the facility. Mayor Sartor limited public comment to one hour. The council took no formal action because the topic was listed as a discussion item only, not an action item. However, Councilmember Chris Judd committed on the record to bringing the facility as a formal action item at the next council meeting. Two state senators spoke in opposition. Thirty-eight Arizona state legislators sent a letter demanding the council formally oppose the facility. And a new, critical safety issue emerged: the Rinchem hazardous chemical warehouse directly across the street from the planned detention site stores chlorine, hydrofluoric acid, and fluorine at levels that trigger federal risk planning requirements.
Sources: AZFamily: Surprise Residents Challenge City Leaders (April 8, 2026) → | The Center Square: Arizonans Express Frustration (April 8, 2026) → | KTAR: Democrats Want Surprise Council to Oppose Center (April 8, 2026) → | AZ Senate Democrats: Full Letter (April 7, 2026) →
Here's what matters most right now
The May 5 meeting has passed. The next council meeting is May 19. Judd's proposed letter asks DHS to comply with local zoning. That is a request, not a resolution. Other cities have passed formal resolutions opposing facilities, withheld water hookups, and filed lawsuits. Surprise has done none of these. Show up and demand the council use every tool it has before October.
Dysart High School student body VP Cali Overs launched a petition calling on Congress to mandate a 3-mile safety buffer zone between ICE detention facilities and K-12 schools. She has met with the offices of Senators Kelly and Gallego and Rep. Gosar, spoke with AG Mayes, published an op-ed in the Phoenix New Times, and spoken at multiple council meetings. She is 17 years old and not affiliated with any political party. Her petition has over 1,500 verified signatures.
The Rinchem chemical warehouse across the street stores chlorine, hydrofluoric acid, and fluorine. Its current risk management plan does not account for a detention facility holding hundreds to thousands of people who cannot self-evacuate. Rinchem has until June to update the plan. No detainee should be housed in a facility across the street from a hazmat site operating under an outdated emergency plan.
On April 24, AG Mayes sued DHS and ICE in federal court over the Surprise facility, alleging NEPA and INA violations. On April 15, a federal judge in Maryland granted a preliminary injunction halting a nearly identical warehouse-to-detention-facility conversion under the same NEPA theory. The Arizona suit follows that template. Contact her office in support of the action.
Thank him for demanding transparency and push him to release any DHS written response publicly, including the withheld NEPA environmental survey results.
On April 16, Kelly and Gallego sent a formal letter to DHS Secretary Mullin demanding a halt to all detention expansion in Arizona, including Surprise and Marana. They set a May 1 response deadline. DHS has not responded to either their original February letter or the April follow-up. Two deadlines, zero responses. Thank them and push for follow-through: request an Inspector General investigation, hearings, or holds on DHS nominees.
DHS said 1,500. Documents show up to 10,000 for months at a time. That's the story. Share it.
Judd proposed a letter requesting DHS honor local zoning and Luke AFB restrictions. The city attorney blocked disclosure of the legal review. DHS confirmed the opening timeline is slipping past September. Public comment overwhelmingly opposed.
74 public speakers, nearly all opposed. Council took no action (discussion item only). Judd committed to bringing a formal action item. 38 state legislators sent a letter demanding formal opposition.
DHS made four verbal commitments: bed tax, facility tour, school/senior center protections, community board. None are in writing.
Another packed crowd. City leaders confirmed they are still waiting for written answers from DHS.
Over 1,000 residents packed City Hall. This meeting changed everything and forced responses from officials at every level of government.
The documented facts about the proposed ICE facility
Directly across the street. Stores chlorine, hydrofluoric acid, and fluorine at levels that trigger federal risk planning requirements per EPA and ADEQ filings. A worst-case leak could require evacuation of half a mile to a mile. Detainees cannot self-evacuate. Rinchem's current risk management plan does not account for the detention facility.
on the same street at 14506 W Sweetwater Ave. K-8 school with 1,868 students just blocks away.
Half a mile away. Students have started petitions for a three-mile buffer zone between detention facilities and schools. Some students have stopped attending out of fear. Student body population is over 60% Hispanic.
5,000+ residents, average age 36. Young families who chose this area for its safety and schools.
2,830 residents, gated family community; the warehouse sits just 300 yards from residential homes.
Arizona passed laws to protect the base's mission, including a statute outlawing overnight stays in departure areas nearby. A detention facility with continuous overnight occupancy may conflict with those protections.
Sources: KJZZ, AZFamily, 12News, AZ Attorney General
Know the facts when the conversation gets hard
The city has more leverage than officials are letting on. While federal law does supersede local zoning, the city controls water hookups, sewer service, and electrical agreements, and can condition those on transparency.
AG Kris Mayes is pursuing a public nuisance lawsuit. In Hanover County, VA and Oklahoma City, formal opposition by local officials directly led to property owners withdrawing. The political cost matters.
This campaign isn't about immigration policy; it's about transparency and community impact. You can support enforcement and still demand that a facility of this scale not be placed next to a K-8 school without any notice.
Rep. Paul Gosar, who strongly supports the president's immigration agenda, called DHS's process "crappy" and demanded written answers. Even supporters of enforcement agree this process was wrong.
DHS's own documents show the facility could fall into a second category: 7,000–10,000 detainees for stays up to 60 days. DHS has not clarified which type Surprise will be, and their documents contradict each other.
Arizona's existing ICE facility in Eloy, originally described in similar terms, became the deadliest detention center in America. ICE's largest new facility (Camp East Montana, El Paso) is now being considered for closure after three deaths, a measles outbreak, and 60+ federal standards violations in under eight months.
In Minneapolis, businesses reported 50–80% revenue drops and police worked 3,000+ overtime hours in 4 days at a cost of $2–3M to taxpayers. Schools went into lockdown.
Construction of a $150M facility creates years of heavy traffic, noise, and disruption on Sweetwater Avenue, the same street as Legacy Traditional School. Emergency service demands will increase, potentially raising city costs passed to taxpayers.
Federal data shows that only 25% of people detained nationally in January 2026 had any criminal record. The majority are civil immigration detainees, not criminal defendants.
A facility holding thousands of people near schools and neighborhoods raises real community health and safety concerns regardless of who is inside: traffic, disease transmission, emergency response strain, and more.
Community leaders and elected officials at every level immediately condemned the vandalism as illegal, dangerous, and counterproductive. Councilman Melton was explicit: "That doesn't help anybody."
Over 1,000 people showed up peacefully at city hall. Hundreds more at the February 18 meeting. That peaceful democratic pressure is what forced Gosar to write letters, got AG Mayes involved, and generated national AP coverage. One person's criminal act does not represent this community.
Rinchem's facility directly across from the planned detention site stores chlorine, hydrofluoric acid, and fluorine. These are documented in EPA and ADEQ filings at levels that trigger federal risk management planning requirements. Experts say a worst-case chemical release could travel thousands of feet, causing respiratory damage and chemical burns.
Rinchem's current risk management plan was written before anyone proposed housing hundreds to thousands of people across the street. Those people, if detained, cannot leave on their own during an emergency. Rinchem has until June 2026 to update that plan. Until then, no one has assessed the actual risk to the people who would be locked inside that facility during a chemical event.
Yes. The city has more leverage than it has used so far. The Surprise City Council passed a high-water-use ordinance requiring council approval for any facility using more than 100,000 gallons per day. The city manager estimated this facility could use nearly 270,000 gallons per day. The council has not yet exercised this authority.
The city also controls water hookups, sewer service, and electrical agreements. Councilmember Judd raised additional concerns about state laws protecting Luke Air Force Base's mission, which prohibit overnight stays in departure areas near the base. A facility detaining people around the clock may conflict with those protections. And the council can pass a formal resolution of opposition, as Hanover County, VA and Pima County, AZ both did.
Documented impacts, with sources
Why this matters: A major international human rights organization with decades of documentation experience is now on the record about Surprise specifically. The statement does not ask the city to mitigate the facility; it asks the city to block it unless DHS provides written, enforceable guarantees of humane conditions.
Source: Human Rights Watch: Another Disturbing Surprise From ICE (April 9, 2026) →
Why this matters: People detained in a locked facility cannot leave on their own during a chemical emergency. The emergency plan that governs the response was written before anyone proposed putting them there. Until Rinchem updates its plan and an independent assessment is conducted, the risk to human life is unknown and unaddressed.
Sources: AZFamily (April 8, 2026) | The Center Square (April 8, 2026) | EPA Risk Management Plan filings, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
Why this matters for Surprise: A contractor with no detention experience, awarded a billion-dollar contract without competitive bidding, is being handed responsibility for a facility next to a K-8 school. This is the same company whose Florida facility faces ongoing lawsuits.
Sources: AZFamily (March 10–11) | Rep. Stanton press release (March 12) | Tucson Sentinel (March 12)
The legal path forward: A NEPA-based lawsuit by AG Mayes would cite the same violations the Maryland court just found credible enough to halt construction. The precedent is now on the books.
Sources: Washington Post (March 11) | Maryland Daily Record (March 12)
Source: KJZZ (Feb 18, 2026)
Why this matters for Surprise: ICE's own flagship facility, built with $1.3 billion in federal contracts, is failing its most basic health and safety standards in under a year. This is the model being proposed for a warehouse next to a K-8 school in Surprise.
Sources: Washington Post (March 4) | NBC News (March 5) | AP / Boston Globe (March 6)
The takeaway: Surprise is not alone. This is a statewide fight, and organized opposition at the local level is the proven strategy.
Sources: AZFamily | KJZZ | Arizona Mirror (Feb 26–27, 2026)
Sources: City of Minneapolis, CBS Minnesota, MN Attorney General
Sources: KOCO News, KGOU (NPR), News9
Sources: WVTF (NPR), NBC12, CBS6 Richmond
Sources: Boston Globe (Feb 24) | NHPR (Feb 24)
Sources: Detention Watch Network, NPR
Why this matters for Surprise: A new 1,500–10,000 bed facility on the same street as a K-8 school creates this exact risk in our community.
Sources: CNN (Jan 28) | Rep. Ansari press release | Tucson Sentinel (Feb 10)
Make your voice heard at every level of government
Send to all seven councilmembers before the next meeting
Mayor Sartor and Surprise City Council,
On April 15, Mayor Sartor publicly stated on KTAR that he opposes any legal action by the city against the ICE facility, calling it a waste of city resources. I respect the mayor’s right to hold that position. I am writing to the other six members of the council because the mayor holds one of seven votes, and the motion Councilmember Judd proposed on April 7 to protect local authority, the city’s water supply, and Surprise residents has not yet come up for a vote.
When that vote comes, I am asking each councilmember to support the following:
The mayor made his position public before the vote. I am asking each councilmember to make yours public as well, and to put your one vote on the record when this motion comes before you.
The Arizona Removal Operations Coordination Center, forty miles from here, was designed for 157 people and a 12-hour hold. Congressional oversight on April 9 found 274 people held for an average of 36 hours, in rooms with no beds and no showers. That is what DHS’s written standards actually produce in Arizona right now. Verbal promises are not enough.
Sincerely,
[Your name, address, phone, email]
Be the first to know when this site is updated with breaking news
Enter your email below to get an automatic notification whenever this page is updated. That is all this does: we do not collect, store, or share your information in any way. Your email goes directly to follow.it, a third-party notification service. The Surprise Community Coalition never sees it.
Every claim on this site is backed by credible news sources
Connect with groups fighting for community rights
Legal resources and community organizing support for fighting detention facilities.
acluaz.org →Arizona-based experts who have fought Eloy facility conditions for years.
firrp.org →National coordination and #CommunitiesNotCages campaign resources.
detentionwatchnetwork.org →